Paper detail

Test of Nuclear Decay Rate Variation due to an Antineutrino Flux

Unexplained variations of the decay rate for weak interaction decays such as $β^{\pm}$-decay, electron capture, as well as strong interaction $α$-decay have been reported. Some researcher interpreted these variations as caused by an unexplained fundamental interaction. The purpose of the paper is to review decay rate parameter variations experiments and place them into a common comparable context and to make decay parameter measurements at the level of 10$^{-5}$ in the presences of an antineutrino flux, $\sim 3 \times10^{12}$ $\overlineν \, cm^{-2} \, sec^{-1}$, 6.5 meters from the High Flux Isotope Reactor(HFIR) reactor core having an on-off cycle time of $\sim$30 days. Two weak interaction decays, one via electron capture and the other via $β^-$ decay were selected because the final state and the time reverse state each contain a neutrino and anti-neutrino, covering arguments that the anti-neutrino flux may interact differently or not at all in one of the cases. The experiment searched for variation of the $^{54}_{25}$Mn, e$^-$ capture and $^{137}_{~55}$Cs, $β^-$ decay rate parameters. The measured variation in the decay rate parameters are found to be $δλ/ λ= (0.034\pm 1.38)\times 10^{-5}$ for $^{54}_{25}$Mn and $δλ/ λ= (0.67\pm 1.56)\times 10^{-5}$ for $^{137}_{~55}$Cs. These results are consistent with no measurable decay rate parameter variation due to an antineutrino flux, yielding a $68\%$ confidence level upper limit sensitivity for $^{54}_{25}$Mn, $δλ/ λ\leq 1.31\times10^{-5}$ or $σ\leq 1.29\times10^{-25}\,cm^{2}$ in cross section and for $^{137}_{~55}$Cs, $δλ/ λ\leq 2.23\times10^{-5}$ or $σ\leq 5.69\times10^{-27}\,cm^{2}$. These null or no observable effect measurements places cross-section upper limits $\sim 10^{4}$ times more sensitive than past experiments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.