Paper detail

Test of low radioactive molecular sieves for radon filtration in SF6 gas-based rare-event physics experiments

Type 5A molecular sieves (MS) have been demonstrated to remove radon from SF$_6$ gas. This is important for ultra-sensitive SF$_6$ gas-based directional dark matter and related rare-event physics experiments, as radon can provide a source of unwanted background events. Unfortunately, commercially available sieves intrinsically emanate radon at levels not suitable for ultra-sensitive physics experiments. A method to produce a low radioactive MS has been developed in Nihon University (NU). In this work, we explore the feasibility of the NU-developed 5A type MS for use in such experiments. A comparison with a commercially available Sigma-Aldrich 5A type MS was made. The comparison was done by calculating a parameter indicating the amount of radon intrinsically emanated by the MS per unit radon captured from SF$_6$ gas. The measurements were made using a specially adapted DURRIDGE RAD7 radon detector. The NU-developed 5A MS emanated radon up to 61$\pm$9$\%$ less per radon captured (2.1$\pm$0.1)$\times 10^{-3}$, compared to the commercial Sigma-Aldrich MS (5.4$\pm$0.4)$\times 10^{-3}$, making it a better candidate for use in a radon filtration setup for future ultra-sensitive SF$_6$ gas based experiments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.