Paper detail

Test of Lorentz Invarience from Compton Scattering

In the recent times, test of Lorentz Invariance has been used as a means to probe theories of physics beyond the standard model. We describe a simple way of utilizing the polarimeters, which are a critical beam instrument at precision and intensity frontier nuclear physics labs such as the erstwhile Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) and Jefferson Lab (JLab), to constrain the dependence of vacuum dispersion with the energy of the photons and its direction of propagation at unprecedented level of precision. We obtain a limit of minimal Standard Model extension (MSME) parameters: $\sqrt{κ_X^2 + κ_Y^2} < 4.6 \times 10^{-10}$ and $\sqrt{\left( 2c_{TX} - (\tildeκ_{0^+}^{YZ} \right)^2 + \left( 2c_{TY} - (\tildeκ_{0^+}^{ZX} \right)^2} < 4.6 \times 10^{-10}$. We also obtain a leading constraint for the refractive index of free space $n = 1 + (2.44\times10^{-9} \pm 6.82\times 10^{-9})$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.