Tensor Meson Pole contributions to the HLbL piece of aμa_μ within RχχT

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Abstract

We compute the tensor meson pole contributions to the Hadronic Light-by-Light piece of aμa_μ in the purely hadronic region, using Resonance Chiral Theory. Given the differences between the dispersive and holographic groups determinations, we consider timely to present an alternative evaluation. In our approach, the lightest tensor meson nonet and two vector meson resonance nonets are considered in the chiral limit. Disregarding operators with derivatives, only the form factor F1T\mathcal{F}_1^T is non-vanishing, as assumed in the dispersive study. All parameters are determined by imposing a set of short-distance QCD constraints, and the radiative decay widths. In this case, we obtain (in units of 10−1110^{-11}): a2 a_2-pole: −(1.02(10)stat(−0.12+0.00)syst)-\left(1.02(10)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.00}_{-0.12})_{\rm syst}\right), f2f_2-pole: −(3.2(3)stat(−0.4+0.0)syst)-\left(3.2(3)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.0}_{-0.4})_{\rm syst}\right) and f2′f_2^\prime-pole: −(0.042(13)stat)-\left(0.042(13)_{\rm stat}\right), which add up to aμa2+f2+f2′−pole=−(4.3−0.5+0.3)a_μ^{a_2+f_2+f_2^\prime \rm -pole}=-\left(4.3^{+0.3}_{-0.5}\right), in close agreement with the holographic result when truncated to F1T\mathcal F_1^T only. However, with an ad-hoc extended Lagrangian, that also generates F3T\mathcal F_3^T, as in the holographic approach, we have found: a2 a_2-pole: +0.47(1.43)norm(3)stat(−0.00+0.06)syst+0.47(1.43)_{\rm norm}(3)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.06}_{-0.00})_{\rm syst}, f2f_2-pole: +1.18(4.18)norm(12)stat(−0.00+0.24)syst+1.18(4.18)_{\rm norm}(12)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.24}_{-0.00})_{\rm syst} and f2′f_2^\prime-pole: +0.040(78)norm(2)stat+0.040(78)_{\rm norm}(2)_{\rm stat}, summing to aμa2+f2+f2′−pole=+1.7(4.4)a_μ^{a_2+f_2+f_2^\prime \rm - pole}=+1.7(4.4), which agree with these recent determinations within uncertainties (dominated by the F3T\mathcal F_3^T normalization). We point out that RχTRχT generates all form factors, the contributions to aμa_μ of F2,4,5\mathcal F_{2,4,5} cannot be evaluated in the current basis, preventing for the moment a complete calculation of aμT−polesa_μ^{\rm T-poles} within our framework.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.