Paper detail

Tensor Meson Pole contributions to the HLbL piece of $a_μ$ within R$χ$T

We compute the tensor meson pole contributions to the Hadronic Light-by-Light piece of $a_μ$ in the purely hadronic region, using Resonance Chiral Theory. Given the differences between the dispersive and holographic groups determinations, we consider timely to present an alternative evaluation. In our approach, the lightest tensor meson nonet and two vector meson resonance nonets are considered in the chiral limit. Disregarding operators with derivatives, only the form factor $\mathcal{F}_1^T$ is non-vanishing, as assumed in the dispersive study. All parameters are determined by imposing a set of short-distance QCD constraints, and the radiative decay widths. In this case, we obtain (in units of $10^{-11}$): $ a_2$-pole: $-\left(1.02(10)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.00}_{-0.12})_{\rm syst}\right)$, $f_2$-pole: $-\left(3.2(3)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.0}_{-0.4})_{\rm syst}\right)$ and $f_2^\prime$-pole: $-\left(0.042(13)_{\rm stat}\right)$, which add up to $a_μ^{a_2+f_2+f_2^\prime \rm -pole}=-\left(4.3^{+0.3}_{-0.5}\right)$, in close agreement with the holographic result when truncated to $\mathcal F_1^T$ only. However, with an ad-hoc extended Lagrangian, that also generates $\mathcal F_3^T$, as in the holographic approach, we have found: $ a_2$-pole: $+0.47(1.43)_{\rm norm}(3)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.06}_{-0.00})_{\rm syst}$, $f_2$-pole: $+1.18(4.18)_{\rm norm}(12)_{\rm stat}(^{+0.24}_{-0.00})_{\rm syst}$ and $f_2^\prime$-pole: $+0.040(78)_{\rm norm}(2)_{\rm stat}$, summing to $a_μ^{a_2+f_2+f_2^\prime \rm - pole}=+1.7(4.4)$, which agree with these recent determinations within uncertainties (dominated by the $\mathcal F_3^T$ normalization). We point out that $RχT$ generates all form factors, the contributions to $a_μ$ of $\mathcal F_{2,4,5}$ cannot be evaluated in the current basis, preventing for the moment a complete calculation of $a_μ^{\rm T-poles}$ within our framework.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.