Paper detail

Temporal Logic Task Allocation in Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems

In this paper, we consider the problem of optimally allocating tasks, expressed as global Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) specifications, to teams of heterogeneous mobile robots. The robots are classified in different types that capture their different capabilities, and each task may require robots of multiple types. The specific robots assigned to each task are immaterial, as long as they are of the desired type. Given a discrete workspace, our goal is to design paths, i.e., sequences of discrete states, for the robots so that the LTL specification is satisfied. To obtain a scalable solution to this complex temporal logic task allocation problem, we propose a hierarchical approach that first allocates specific robots to tasks using the information about the tasks contained in the Nondeterministic Buchi Automaton (NBA) that captures the LTL specification, and then designs low-level executable plans for the robots that respect the high-level assignment. Specifically, we first prune and relax the NBA by removing all negative atomic propositions. This step is motivated by "lazy collision checking" methods in robotics and allows to simplify the planning problem by checking constraint satisfaction only when needed. Then, we extract sequences of subtasks from the relaxed NBA along with their temporal orders, and formulate a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) to allocate these subtasks to the robots. Finally, we define generalized multi-robot path planning problems to obtain low-level executable robot plans that satisfy both the high-level task allocation and the temporal constraints captured by the negative atomic propositions in the original NBA. We show that our method is complete for a subclass of LTL that covers a broad range of tasks and present numerical simulations demonstrating that it can generate paths with lower cost, considerably faster than existing methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.