Paper detail

Temporal dynamics in immunological synapse: Role of thermal fluctuations in signaling

The article analyzes the contribution of stochastic thermal fluctuations in the attachment times of the immature T-cell receptor TCR: peptide-major-histocompatibility-complex pMHC immunological synapse bond. The key question addressed here is the following: how does a synapse bond remain stabilized in the presence of high frequency thermal noise that potentially equates to a strong detaching force? Focusing on the average time persistence of an immature synapse, we show that the high frequency nodes accompanying large fluctuations are counterbalanced by low frequency nodes that evolve over longer time periods. Our analysis shows that such a behavior could be easily explained from the fact that the survival probability distribution is governed by two distinct phases, for the two different time regimes. The relatively shorter time scales correspond to the cohesion:adhesion induced immature bond formation whereas the larger time reciprocates the association:dissociation regime leading to TCR:pMHC signaling. From an estimation of the bond survival probability, we show that at shorter time scales, this probability $P_Δ(τ)$ scales with time $τ$ as an universal function of a rescaled noise amplitude $\frac{D}{Δ^2}$, such that $P_Δ(τ)\sim τ^{-(\fracΔ{\sqrt{D}}+\frac{1}{2})}$, $Δ$ being the distance from the mean inter-membrane (T cell:Antigen Presenting Cell) separation distance. The crossover from this shorter to a longer time regime leads to an universality in the dynamics, at which point the survival probability shows a different power-law scaling compared to the one at shorter time scales. In biological terms, such a crossover indicates that the TCR:pMHC bond has a survival probability with a slower decay rate than the longer LFA-1:ICAM-1 bond justifying its stability.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.