Paper detail

Temperatures are not useful to characterise bright-soliton experiments for ultra-cold atoms

Contrary to many other translationally invariant one-dimensional models, the low-temperature phase for an attractively interacting one-dimensional Bose-gas (a quantum bright soliton) is stable against thermal fluctuations. However, treating the thermal properties of quantum bright solitons within the canonical ensemble leads to anomalous fluctuations of the total energy that indicate that canonical and micro-canonical ensembles are not equivalent. State-of-the-art experiments are best described by the micro-canonical ensemble, within which we predict a co-existence between single atoms and solitons even in the thermodynamic limit - contrary to strong predictions based on both the Landau hypothesis and the canonical ensemble. This questions the use of temperatures to describe state-of-the-art bright soliton experiments that currently load Bose-Einstein condensates into quasi-one-dimensional wave guides without adding contact to a heat bath.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.