Paper detail

Temperature dependence of (111) and (110) ceria surface energy

High temperature properties of ceria surfaces are important for many applications. Here we report the temperature dependences of surface energy for the (111) and (110) CeO2 obtained in the framework of the extended two-stage upsampled thermodynamic integration using Langevin dynamics (TU-TILD). The method was used together with machinelearning potentials called moment tensor potentials (MTPs), which were fitted to the results of the ab initio MD calculations for (111) and (110) CeO2 at different temperatures. The parameters of MTPs training and fitting were tested and the optimal algorithm for the ceria systems was proposed. We found that the temperature increases from 0 K to 2100 K led to the decrease of the Helmholtz free energy of (111) CeO2 from 0.78 J/m2 to 0.64 J/m2. The energy of (110) CeO2 dropped from 1.19 J/m2 at 0 K to 0.92 J/m2 at 1800 K. We show that it is important to take anharmonicity into account as simple consideration of volume expansion gives wrong temperature dependences of the surface energies.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.