Paper detail

Temeprature-dependent Seeger's liquid drop energy for nuclei up to Z=118

Seeger's semi-empirical mass formula is revisited for two of its constants (bulk constant α(0) and neutron-proton asymmetry constant a_{a}) readjusted to obtain the ground-state (g.s.) binding energies of nuclei within a precision of <1.5 MeV and for nuclei up to Z=118. The aim is to include the temperature T-dependence on experimental binding energies, and not to obtain the new parameter set of Seeger's liquid drop energy VLDM . Our proceedure is to define the g.s. binding energy B = V_{LDM} + δU, as per Strutinsky renormalization procedure, and using the empirical shell corrections δU of Myers and Swiatecki, fit the constants of V_{LDM} to obtain the experimental binding energy Bexpt or theoretically calculated Btheo if data were not available. The T-dependence of the constants of V_{LDM}, is introduced as per the work of Davidson et al., where the pairing energy δ(T) is modified as per new calculations on compound nucleus decays. The newly fitted constants of V_{LDM} at T=0 are made available here for use of other workers interested in nuclear dynamics of hot and rotating nuclei.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.