Paper detail

Tangent-point repulsive potentials for a class of non-smooth $m$-dimensional sets in $\R^n$. Part I: Smoothing and self-avoidance effects

We consider repulsive potential energies $\E_q(Σ)$, whose integrand measures tangent-point interactions, on a large class of non-smooth $m$-dimensional sets $Σ$ in $\R^n.$ Finiteness of the energy $\E_q(Σ)$ has three sorts of effects for the set $Σ$: topological effects excluding all kinds of (a priori admissible) self-intersections, geometric and measure-theoretic effects, providing large projections of $Σ$ onto suitable $m$-planes and therefore large $m$-dimensional Hausdorff measure of $Σ$ within small balls up to a uniformly controlled scale, and finally, regularizing effects culminating in a geometric variant of the Morrey-Sobolev embedding theorem: Any admissible set $Σ$ with finite $\E_q$-energy, for any exponent $q>2m$, is, in fact, a $C^1$-manifold whose tangent planes vary in a Hölder continuous manner with the optimal Hölder exponent $μ=1-(2m)/q$. Moreover, the patch size of the local $C^{1,μ}$-graph representations is uniformly controlled from below only in terms of the energy value $\E_q(Σ)$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.