Paper detail

Taking EGSnrc to new lows: Development of egs++ lattice geometry and testing with microscopic

Purpose: This work introduces a new lattice geometry library, egs_lattice, into the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code, which can be used for both modeling very large (previously unfeasible) quantities of geometries and establishing recursive boundary conditions. The reliability of egs_lattice, as well as EGSnrc in general, is cross-validated and tested. Methods: New Bravais, cubic, and hexagonal lattice geometries are defined in egs_lattice and their transport algorithms are described. Simulations of cells and Gold NanoParticle (GNP) containing cavities are implemented to compare to published Geant4-DNA and PENELOPE results. Recursive boundary conditions, implemented through a cubic lattice, are used to perform electron Fano cavity tests. Results: Lattices are successfully implemented in EGSnrc. EGSnrc calculated doses to cell cytoplasm and nucleus when irradiated by an internal electron source with a median difference of 0.6% compared to Geant4-DNA. EGSnrc calculated the ratio of dose to a microscopic cavity containing GNPs over dose to a cavity containing a homogeneous mixture of gold, and results generally agree (within 1%) with PENELOPE. The Fano test is passed (sub-0.1%) for all energies/ cells considered. Additionally, the recursive boundary conditions used for the Fano test provided a factor of over a million increase in efficiency in some cases. Conclusions: The egs_lattice geometry library, currently available as a pull request on the EGSnrc GitHub develop branch, is now freely accessible as open-source code. Lattice geometry implementations cross-validated with independent simulations in other MC codes and verified with the electron Fano cavity test demonstrate not only the reliability of egs_lattice, but, by extension, EGSnrc's ability to simulate transport in nanometer geometries and score in microscopic cavities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.