Paper detail

Taking Care of The Discretization Problem: A Comprehensive Study of the Discretization Problem and A Black-Box Adversarial Attack in Discrete Integer Domain

Numerous methods for crafting adversarial examples were proposed recently with high success rate. Since most existing machine learning based classifiers normalize images into some continuous, real vector, domain firstly, attacks often craft adversarial examples in such domain. However, "adversarial" examples may become benign after denormalizing them back into the discrete integer domain, known as the discretization problem. This problem was mentioned in some work, but has received relatively little attention. In this work, we first conduct a comprehensive study of existing methods and tools for crafting. We theoretically analyze 34 representative methods and empirically study 20 representative open source tools for crafting adversarial images. Our study reveals that the discretization problem is far more serious than originally thought. This suggests that the discretization problem should be taken into account seriously when crafting adversarial examples and measuring attack success rate. As a first step towards addressing this problem in black-box scenario, we propose a black-box method which reduces the adversarial example searching problem to a derivative-free optimization problem. Our method is able to craft adversarial images by derivative-free search in the discrete integer domain. Experimental results show that our method is comparable to recent white-box methods (e.g., FGSM, BIM and C\&W) and achieves significantly higher success rate in terms of adversarial examples in the discrete integer domain than recent black-box methods (e.g., ZOO, NES-PGD and Bandits). Moreover, our method is able to handle models that is non-differentiable and successfully break the winner of NIPS 2017 competition on defense with 95\% success rate. Our results suggest that discrete optimization algorithms open up a promising area of research into effective black-box attacks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.