Paper detail

Take the Scenic Route: Improving Generalization in Vision-and-Language Navigation

In the Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) task, an agent with egocentric vision navigates to a destination given natural language instructions. The act of manually annotating these instructions is timely and expensive, such that many existing approaches automatically generate additional samples to improve agent performance. However, these approaches still have difficulty generalizing their performance to new environments. In this work, we investigate the popular Room-to-Room (R2R) VLN benchmark and discover that what is important is not only the amount of data you synthesize, but also how you do it. We find that shortest path sampling, which is used by both the R2R benchmark and existing augmentation methods, encode biases in the action space of the agent which we dub as action priors. We then show that these action priors offer one explanation toward the poor generalization of existing works. To mitigate such priors, we propose a path sampling method based on random walks to augment the data. By training with this augmentation strategy, our agent is able to generalize better to unknown environments compared to the baseline, significantly improving model performance in the process.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.