Paper detail

Tailoring Native Defects in LiFePO4: Insights from First-Principles Calculations

We report first-principles density-functional theory studies of native point defects and defect complexes in olivine-type LiFePO4, a promising candidate for rechargeable Li-ion battery electrodes. The defects are characterized by their formation energies which are calculated within the GGA+U framework. We find that native point defects are charged, and each defect is stable in one charge state only. Removing electrons from the stable defects always generates defect complexes containing small hole polarons. Defect formation energies, hence concentrations, and defect energy landscapes are all sensitive to the choice of atomic chemical potentials which represent experimental conditions. One can, therefore, suppress or enhance certain native defects in LiFePO4 via tuning the synthesis conditions. Based on our results, we provide insights on how to obtain samples in experiments with tailored defect concentrations for targeted applications. We also discuss the mechanisms for ionic and electronic conduction in LiFePO4 and suggest strategies for enhancing the electrical conductivity.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.