Paper detail

TableQnA: Answering List Intent Queries With Web Tables

The web contains a vast corpus of HTML tables. They can be used to provide direct answers to many web queries. We focus on answering two classes of queries with those tables: those seeking lists of entities (e.g., `cities in california') and those seeking superlative entities (e.g., `largest city in california'). The main challenge is to achieve high precision with significant coverage. Existing approaches train machine learning models to select the answer from the candidates; they rely on textual match features between the query and the content of the table along with features capturing table quality/importance. These features alone are inadequate for achieving the above goals. Our main insight is that we can improve precision by (i) first extracting intent (structured information) from the query for the above query classes and (ii) then performing structure-aware matching (instead of just textual matching) between the extracted intent and the candidates to select the answer. We model (i) as a sequence tagging task. We leverage state-of-the-art deep neural network models with word embeddings. The model requires large scale training data which is expensive to obtain via manual labeling; we therefore develop a novel method to automatically generate the training data. For (ii), we develop novel features to compute structure-aware match and train a machine learning model. Our experiments on real-life web search queries show that (i) our intent extractor for list and superlative intent queries has significantly higher precision and coverage compared with baseline approaches and (ii) our table answer selector significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approach. This technology has been used in production by Microsoft's Bing search engine since 2016.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.