Paper detail

T-RACKs: A Faster Recovery Mechanism for TCP in Data Center Networks

Cloud interactive data-driven applications generate swarms of small TCP flows that compete for the small buffer space in data-center switches. Such applications require a short flow completion time (FCT) to perform their jobs effectively. However, TCP is oblivious to the composite nature of application data and artificially inflates the FCT of such flows by several orders of magnitude. This is due to TCP's Internet-centric design that fixes the retransmission timeout (RTO) to be at least hundreds of milliseconds. To better understand this problem, in this paper, we use empirical measurements in a small testbed to study, at a microscopic level, the effects of various types of packet losses on TCP's performance. In particular, we single out packet losses that impact the tail end of small flows, as well as bursty losses, that span a significant fraction of the small congestion window of TCP flows in data-centers, to show a non-negligible effect on the FCT. Based on this, we propose the so-called, timely-retransmitted ACKs (or T-RACKs), a simple loss recovery mechanism to conceal the drawbacks of the long RTO even in the presence of heavy packet losses. Interestingly enough, T-RACKS achieves this transparently to TCP itself as it does not require any change to TCP in the tenant's virtual machine (VM). T-RACKs can be implemented as a software shim layer in the hypervisor between the VMs and server's NIC or in hardware as a networking function in a SmartNIC. Simulation and real testbed results show that T-RACKs achieves remarkable performance improvements.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.