Paper detail

t->cg, cγ, cZ in the Left-Right Supersymmetric Model

We analyse top quark flavor violating decays into a charm quark and a gluon, photon or Z boson in a supersymmetric model incorporating left-right symmetry. We include loop calculations involving contributions from scalar quarks, gluinos, charginos and neutralinos. We perform the calculations first assuming the minimal (flavor diagonal) scalar quark scenario, and then allowing for arbitrary mixing between the second and third generation of scalar quarks, in both the up and down sectors. In each case we present separately the contributions from gluino, chargino and neutralino loops and compare their respective strengths. In the flavor-diagonal case, the branching ratio cannot exceed 10^-5 (10^-6) for the gluon (photon/Z boson); while for the unconstrained (flavor non-diagonal) case the same branching ratios can reach almost 10^-4 for the gluon, 10^-6 for the photon and 10^-5 for the Z boson, all of which are slightly below the expected reach of LHC.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.