Paper detail

Systematic study on probable projectile-target combinations for the synthesis of the $^{302}$120 superheavy nucleus

Probable projectile-target combinations for the synthesis of superheavy element $^{302}$120 have been studied taking Coulomb and proximity potential as the interaction barrier. The probabilities of compound nucleus formation, PCN for the projectile-target combinations found in the cold reaction valley of $^{302}$120 are estimated. At energies near and above the Coulomb barrier, we have calculated the capture, fusion and evaporation residue cross sections for the reactions of all the probable projectile-target combinations so as to predict the most promising projectile-target combinations for the synthesis of SHE $^{302}$120 in heavy ion fusion reactions. The calculated fusion and evaporation cross section for the more asymmetric (hotter) projectile-target combination is found to be higher than the less asymmetric (colder) combination. It can be seen from the nature of quasi-fission barrier height, mass asymmetry, probability of compound nucleus formation, survival probability and excitation energy, the systems $^{44}$Ar + $^{258}$No, $^{46}$Ar + $^{256}$No, $^{48}$Ca + $^{254}$Fm, $^{50}$Ca + $^{252}$Fm, $^{54}$Ti + $^{248}$Cf, $^{58}$Cr + $^{244}$Cm in the deep region I of cold reaction valley, and the systems $^{62}$Fe + $^{240}$Pu, $^{64}$Fe + $^{238}$Pu, $^{68}$Ni + $^{234}$U, $^{70}$Ni + $^{232}$U, $^{72}$Ni + $^{230}$U, $^{74}$Zn + $^{228}$Th in the other cold valleys are identified as the better projectile-target combinations for the synthesis of $^{302}$120. Our prediction on the synthesis of $^{302}$120 superheavy nuclei using the combinations $^{54}$Cr+$^{248}$Cm, $^{58}$Fe+$^{244}$Pu, $^{64}$Ni+$^{238}$U and $^{50}$Ti+$^{249}$Cf are compared with available experimental data and other theoretical predictions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.