Paper detail

Systematic study of the $α$ decay preformation factor of nuclei around the $\boldsymbol{Z=82}$, $\boldsymbol{N=126}$ shell closures within a generalized liquid drop model

In this work, we systematically study the $α$ decay preformation factors $P_α$ and $α$ decay half-lives of 152 nuclei around $Z$ = 82, $N$ = 126 closed shells based on a generalized liquid drop model while $P_α$ is extracted from the ratio of the calculated $α$ decay half-life to the experimental one. The results show that there is an obvious linear relationship between $P_α$ and the product of valance protons (holes) $N_p$ and valance neutrons (holes) $N_n$. At the same time, we extract the $$P_α$ values of even-even nuclei around $\emph{Z}$ = 82, $\emph{N}$ = 126 closed shells from the work of Sun \textit{et al.} [\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aac981} {J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. $\bm{45}$, 075106 (2018)}], in which the $P_α$ can be calculated by two different microscopic formulas. We find that the $P_α$ are also related to $N_pN_n$. Combining with our previous works [Sun \textit{et al.}, \href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024338} {Phys. Rev. C $\bm{94}$, 024338 (2016)}; Deng \textit{et al.}, \href {https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC 96.024318} {ibid. $\bm{96}$, 024318 (2017)}; Deng \textit{et al.}, \href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044322} {ibid. $\bm{97}$, 044322 (2018)}] and the work of Seif \textit{et al.} [\href {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064608}{Phys. Rev. C $\bm{84}$, 064608 (2011)}], we suspect that this phenomenon of linear relationship for the nuclei around those closed shells is model independent. It may be caused by the effect of the valence protons (holes) and valence neutrons (holes) around the shell closures. Finally, using the formula obtained by fitting the $P_α$ calculated by the generalized liquid drop model (GLDM), we calculate the $α$ decay half-lives of these nuclei. The calculated results are agree with the experimental data well.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.