Paper detail

Systematic investigation of critical charge limits in Thick GEMs

We present discharge probability studies performed with a single Thick Gas Electron Multiplier (THGEM) irradiated with alpha particles in Ar-CO$_2$ and Ne-CO$_2$ mixtures. We observe a clear dependency of the discharge stability on the noble gas and quencher content pointing to lighter gases being more stable against the development of streamer discharges. A detailed comparison of the measurements with Geant4 simulations allowed us to extract the critical charge value leading to the formation of a spark in a THGEM hole, which is found to be within the range of 3-7$\times10^6$ electrons, depending on the gas mixture. Our experimental findings are compared to previous GEM results. We show that the discharge probability of THGEMs exceeds the one measured with GEMs by orders of magnitude. This can be explained with simple geometrical considerations, where primary ionization is collected by a lower number of holes available in a THGEM structure, reaching higher primary charge densities and thus increasing the probability of a spark occurrence. However, we show that the critical charge limits are similar for both amplification structures.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.