Paper detail

Systematic and correlated nuclear uncertainties in the i-process at the neutron shell closure N = 82

Nuclear astrophysics simulations aiming to study the origin of the elements in stars require a multitude of nuclear physics input. Both systematic model dependent and statistically correlated uncertainties need to be considered. An application where realistic uncertainty assessments are especially important is the intermediate neutron capture process or i process: a neutron capture regime with neutron densities intermediate between the slow and rapid processes. Accordingly, the main network flux proceeds on the neutron-rich unstable isotopes up to 4-5 species off the valley of stability. The i process has been clearly identified to be active in post-AGB stars during the Very Late Thermal Pulse H-ingestion event, and a recent work infers about its important role in early generations of stars. Here we demonstrate the effect of propagating systematic nuclear uncertainties from different theoretical models to final abundances for a region around the 2$^\mathrm{nd}$ peak at $A-Z=80$ for elemental ratio predictions involving Ba, La and Eu in i-process conditions. These elements are used to distinguish different n-capture contributions observed in low-metallicity stars. For the simple 1-zone model adopted here, predictions vary as much as a factor of 22 in on possible observational plane ([La/Eu] vs. [Ba/La]). To consider statistically correlated uncertainties, we similarly perform a full nuclear physics uncertainty study within a given Hauser-Feshbach model and demonstrate the role of correlations on the final stellar abundance uncertainties. We show that in i-process conditions the main result of neglecting correlations is to underestimate the impact of nuclear uncertainties on the final nucleosynthesis yields by as much as two orders of magnitude. (continued in document)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.