Paper detail

Systematic analysis of the proton mass radius based on photoproduction of vector charmoniums

In this work, the cross-section of the reaction $γp \rightarrow V(J/ψ,ψ(2S)) p$ from the production threshold to medium energy is studied and systematically analyzed within two gluon exchange model. The obtained numerical results are in agreement with experimental data and other theoretical predictions. Under the assumption of the scalar form factor of dipole form, the value of proton mass radius is calculated as $0.55\pm 0.09$ fm and $ 0.77\pm 0.12$ fm from the fit to the predicted $J/ψ$ and $ψ(2S)$ differential cross-section, respectively. Finally the average value of proton mass radius is estimated to be $\sqrt{\left<R^2_m \right>}=0.67\pm 0.11$ fm. Moreover, one find that extracting mass radius from the near-threshold differential cross-section of heavy quarkoniums is always affected by large $|t|_{min}$. These obtained results may provide important theoretical reference for understanding of nucleon structure and future relevant experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.