Paper detail

Symplectic group structure of the 48Cr, 88Ru, and 92Pd ground states

The ground states of 48Cr, 88Ru, and 92Pd are studied in the 1f7/2 or 1g9/2 shell model with effective interactions from the literature. They are found to be composed, quite independently of the shell and the interaction, roughly of 75% of (s,t)=(0,0) and 25% of (s,t)=(4,0), where s is the seniority and t the reduced isospin. Other irreps of the symplectic group Sp(2j+1), where j is the single-nucleon angular momentum, make only very small contributions. The state chi obtained by antisymmetriziation and normalization of the ground state in the stretch scheme of Danos and Gillet [M. Danos and V. Gillet, Phys. Rev. 161, 1034 (1967)] has a very different structure where the Sp(2j+1) irreps other than (s,t)=(0,0) and (4,0) contribute 20% and 41% for j=7/2 and 9/2, respectively. The contributions of chi and the s=0 state to the calculated ground states state are about equal for 48Cr. For 88Ru and 92Pd the s=0 state is unambiguously a better approximation to the calculated states than chi. A state chi' obtained by antisymmetrization and normalization of the product of two stretch-scheme ground states of the system with two valence nucleons or nucleon holes of each type has much larger overlaps with the calculated ground states than chi but a deviating Sp(2j+1) decomposition.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.