Paper detail

Symmetry via Spherical Reflection and Spanning Drops in a Wedge

We consider embedded ring-type surfaces (that is, compact, connected, orientable surfaces with two boundary components and Euler-Poincaré characteristic zero) in ${\bold R}^3$ of constant mean curvature which meet planes $Π_1$ and $Π_2$ in constant contact angles $γ_1$ and $γ_2$ and bound, together with those planes, an open set in ${\bold R}^3$. If the planes are parallel, then it is known that any contact angles may be realized by infinitely many such surfaces given explicitly in terms of elliptic integrals. If $Π_1$ meets $Π_2$ in an angle $α$ and if $γ_1+γ_2>π+α$, then portions of spheres provide (explicit) solutions. In the present work it is shown that if $γ_1+γ_2\leπ+α$, then the problem admits no solution. The result contrasts with recent work of H.C.~Wente who constructed, in the particular case $γ_1 = γ_2 =π/2$, a {\it self-intersecting} surface spanning a wedge as described above. Our proof is based on an extension of the Alexandrov planar reflection procedure to a reflection about spheres, on the intrinsic geometry of the surface, and on a new maximum principle related to surface geometry. The method should be of interest also in connection with other problems arising in the global differential geometry of surfaces.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.