Paper detail

Symmetries of cyclic work distributions for an isolated harmonic oscillator

We have calculated the distribution of work $W$ done on a 1-d harmonic oscillator that is initially in canonical equilibrium at temperature $T$, then thermally isolated and driven by an arbitrary time-dependent cyclic spring constant $κ(t)$, and demonstrated that it satisfies $P(W)=\exp(βW)P(-W)$, where $β=1/k_{B}T$, in both classical and quantum dynamics. This differs from the celebrated Crooks relation of nonequilibrium thermodynamics, since the latter relates distributions for forward and backward protocols of driving. We show that it is a special case of a symmetry that holds for non-cyclic work processes on the isolated oscillator, and that consideration of time reversal invariance shows it to be consistent with the Crooks relation. We have verified that the symmetry holds in both classical and quantum treatments of the dynamics, but that inherent uncertainty in the latter case leads to greater fluctuations in work performed for a given process.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.