Paper detail

Symmetric Grothendieck inequality

We establish an analogue of the Grothendieck inequality where the rectangular matrix is replaced by a symmetric/Hermitian matrix and the bilinear form by a quadratic form. We call this the symmetric Grothendieck inequality; despite its name, it is a generalization -- the original Grothendieck inequality is a special case. While there are other proposals for such an inequality, ours differs in two important ways: (i) we have no additional requirement like positive semidefiniteness; (ii) our symmetric Grothendieck constant is universal, i.e., independent of the matrix and its dimensions. A consequence of our symmetric Grothendieck inequality is a "conic Grothendieck inequality" for any family of cones of symmetric matrices: The original Grothendieck inequality is a special case; as is the Nesterov $π/2$-Theorem, which corresponds to the cones of positive semidefinite matrices; as well as the Goemans-Williamson inequality, which corresponds to the cones of Laplacians. For yet other cones, e.g., of diagonally dominant matrices, we get new Grothendieck-like inequalities. A slight extension leads to a unified framework that treats any Grothendieck-like inequality as an inequality between two norms within a family of "Grothendieck norms" restricted to a family of cones. This allows us to place on equal footing the Goemans-Williamson inequality, Nesterov $π/2$-Theorem, Ben-Tal-Nemirovski-Roos $4/π$-Theorem, generalized Grothendieck inequality, order-$p$ Grothendieck inequality, rank-constrained positive semidefinite Grothendieck inequality; and in turn allows us to simplify proofs, extend results from real to complex, obtain new bounds or establish sharpness of existing ones. The symmetric Grothendieck inequality may also be applied to obtain polynomial-time approximation bounds for NP-hard combinatorial, integer, and nonconvex optimization problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.