Paper detail

Surface properties and scaling behavior of a generalized ballistic deposition model in (1+1)-dimension

The surface exponents, the scaling behavior and the bulk porosity of a generalized ballistic deposition (GBD) model are studied. In nature, there exist particles with varying degrees of stickiness ranging from completely non-sticky to fully sticky. Such particles may adhere to any one of the successively encountered surfaces, depending on a sticking probability %should have the possibility of sticking to any of the %allowed points of contact on the surface with a sticking probability that is governed by the underlying stochastic mechanism. The microscopic configurations possible in this model are much larger than those allowed in existing models of ballistic deposition and competitive growth models that seek to mix ballistic and random deposition processes. In this article, we find the scaling exponents for surface width and porosity for the proposed GBD model. In terms of scaled width $\widetilde{W}$ and scaled time $\tilde{t}$, the numerical data collapse on to a single curve, demonstrating successful scaling with sticking probability p and system size L. Similar scaling behavior is also found for the porosity.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.