Paper detail

Surface band structure of $\text{Bi}_{1-x}\text{Sb}_{x}$(111)

Theoretical and experimental studies agree that $\text{Bi}_{1-x}\text{Sb}_{x}$ ($0.07 \leq x \leq 0.21$) to be a three-dimensional topological insulator. However, there is still a debate on the corresponding $\text{Bi}_{1-x}\text{Sb}_{x}$(111) surface band structure. While three spin polarized bands have been claimed experimentally, theoretically, only two surface bands appear, with the third band being attributed to surface imperfections. Here, we address this controversy using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) on $\text{Bi}_{1-x}\text{Sb}_{x}$ films. To minimize surface imperfections, we have optimized the sample growth recipe. We have measured the evolution of the surface band structure of $\text{Bi}_{1-x}\text{Sb}_{x}$ with $x$ increasing gradually from $x = 0$ to $x = 0.6$. Our ARPES data show better agreement with the theoretical calculations, where the system is topologically non-trivial with two surface bands.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.