SURE Information Criteria for Large Covariance Matrix Estimation and Their Asymptotic Properties

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Consider nn independent and identically distributed pp-dimensional Gaussian random vectors with covariance matrix Σ.Σ. The problem of estimating ΣΣ when pp is much larger than nn has received a lot of attention in recent years. Yet little is known about the information criterion for covariance matrix estimation. How to properly define such a criterion and what are the statistical properties? We attempt to answer these questions in the present paper by focusing on the estimation of bandable covariance matrices when p>np>n but log⁡(p)=o(n)\log(p)=o(n). Motivated by the deep connection between Stein's unbiased risk estimation (SURE) and AIC in regression models, we propose a family of generalized SURE (SUREc\text{SURE}_c) indexed by cc for covariance matrix estimation, where cc is some constant. When cc is 2, SURE2\text{SURE}_2 provides an unbiased estimator of the Frobenious risk of the covariance matrix estimator. Furthermore, we show that by minimizing SURE2\text{SURE}_2 over all possible banding covariance matrix estimators we attain the minimax optimal rate of convergence and the resulting estimator behaves like the covariance matrix estimator obtained by the so-called oracle tuning. On the other hand, we also show that SURE2\text{SURE}_2 is selection inconsistent when the true covariance matrix is exactly banded. To fix the selection inconsistency, we consider using SURE with c=log⁡(n)c=\log(n) and prove that by minimizing SURElog⁡(n)\text{SURE}_{\log(n)} we select the true bandwith with probability tending to one. Therefore, our analysis indicates that SURE2\text{SURE}_2 and SURElog⁡(n)\text{SURE}_{\log(n)} can be regarded as the AIC and BIC for large covariance matrix estimation, respectively.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.