Paper detail

SURE Information Criteria for Large Covariance Matrix Estimation and Their Asymptotic Properties

Consider $n$ independent and identically distributed $p$-dimensional Gaussian random vectors with covariance matrix $Σ.$ The problem of estimating $Σ$ when $p$ is much larger than $n$ has received a lot of attention in recent years. Yet little is known about the information criterion for covariance matrix estimation. How to properly define such a criterion and what are the statistical properties? We attempt to answer these questions in the present paper by focusing on the estimation of bandable covariance matrices when $p>n$ but $\log(p)=o(n)$. Motivated by the deep connection between Stein's unbiased risk estimation (SURE) and AIC in regression models, we propose a family of generalized SURE ($\text{SURE}_c$) indexed by $c$ for covariance matrix estimation, where $c$ is some constant. When $c$ is 2, $\text{SURE}_2$ provides an unbiased estimator of the Frobenious risk of the covariance matrix estimator. Furthermore, we show that by minimizing $\text{SURE}_2$ over all possible banding covariance matrix estimators we attain the minimax optimal rate of convergence and the resulting estimator behaves like the covariance matrix estimator obtained by the so-called oracle tuning. On the other hand, we also show that $\text{SURE}_2$ is selection inconsistent when the true covariance matrix is exactly banded. To fix the selection inconsistency, we consider using SURE with $c=\log(n)$ and prove that by minimizing $\text{SURE}_{\log(n)}$ we select the true bandwith with probability tending to one. Therefore, our analysis indicates that $\text{SURE}_2$ and $\text{SURE}_{\log(n)}$ can be regarded as the AIC and BIC for large covariance matrix estimation, respectively.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.