Paper detail

Supporting OpenMP 5.0 Tasks in hpxMP -- A study of an OpenMP implementation within Task Based Runtime Systems

OpenMP has been the de facto standard for single node parallelism for more than a decade. Recently, asynchronous many-task runtime (AMT) systems have increased in popularity as a new programming paradigm for high performance computing applications. One of the major challenges of this new paradigm is the incompatibility of the OpenMP thread model and other AMTs. Highly optimized OpenMP-based libraries do not perform well when coupled with AMTs because the threading of both libraries will compete for resources. This paper is a follow-up paper on the fundamental implementation of hpxMP, an implementation of the OpenMP standard which utilizes the C++ standard library for Parallelism and Concurrency (HPX) to schedule and manage tasks. In this paper, we present the implementation of task features, e.g. taskgroup, task depend, and task_reduction, of the OpenMP 5.0 standard and optimization of the #pragma omp parallel for pragma. We use the daxpy benchmark, the Barcelona OpenMP Tasks Suite, Parallel research kernels, and OpenBLAS benchmarks to compare the different OpenMp implementations: hpxMP, llvm-OpenMP, and GOMP.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.