Paper detail

Supersymmetric monoidal categories

We develop the idea of a supersymmetric monoidal supercategory, following ideas of Kapranov. Roughly, this is a monoidal category in which the objects and morphisms are ${\bf Z}/2$-graded, equipped with isomorphisms $X \otimes Y \to Y \otimes X$ of parity $\vert X \vert \vert Y \vert$ on homogeneous objects. There are two fundamental examples: the groupoid of spin-sets, and the category of queer vector spaces equipped with the half tensor product; other important examples can be derived from these (such as the category of linear spin species). There are also two general constructions. The first is the exterior algebra of a supercategory (due to Ganter--Kapranov). The second is a construction we introduce called Clifford eversion. This defines an equivalence between a certain 2-category of supersymmetric monoidal supercategories and a corresponding 2-category of symmetric monoidal supercategories. We use our theory to better understand some aspects of the queer superalgebra, such as certain factors of $\sqrt{2}$ in the theory of Q-symmetric functions and Schur--Sergeev duality.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.