Paper detail

Supersymmetric Explanation of CP Violation in $K\to ππ$ Decays

Recent progress in the determination of hadronic matrix elements has revealed a tension between the measured value of $ε_K^{\prime}/ε_K$, which quantifies direct $CP$ violation in $K \to ππ$ decays, and the Standard-Model prediction. The well-understood indirect $CP$ violation encoded in the quantity $ε_K$ typically precludes large new-physics contributions to $ε_K^{\prime}/ε_K$ and challenges such an explanation of the discrepancy. We show that it is possible to cure the $ε_K^{\prime}/ε_K$ anomaly in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with squark masses above 3 TeV without overshooting $ε_K$. This solution exploits two features of supersymmetry: the possibility of large isospin-breaking contributions (enhancing $ε_K^{\prime}$) and the Majorana nature of gluinos (permitting a suppression of $ε_K$). Our solution involves no fine-tuning of $CP$ phases or other parameters.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.