Paper detail

Superradiant diamond color center arrays coupled to concave plasmonic nanoresonators

Different types of concave plasmonic nanoresonators have been optimized to achieve superradiantly enhanced emission of SiV color centers in diamond. Comparative study has been performed to consider advantages of different N number of SiV color centers, different diamond-silver (bare) and diamond-silver-diamond (coated) core-shell nanoresonator types, as well as of spherical and ellipsoidal geometry. The complete fluorescence enhancement (qualified by Px factor) monitoring and the cQE corrected quantum efficiency weighted PxcQE objective function optimization promotes to design bad-cavities for plasmonic Dicke effect. The switching into a collective Dicke state via optimized nanoresonators results in a radiated power proportional to N^2, which manifest itself in an enhancement proportional to N both of the excitation and emission rates. Accordingly, enhancement proportional to N^2 of the Px factor and PxcQE has been reached both via four and six SiV color centers arranged in symmetrical square and hexagonal patterns inside all types of inspected nanoresonators. Coated spherical and bare ellipsoidal nanoresonators result in stronger non-cooperative fluorescence enhancement, while superradiance is better achieved via bare spherical nanoresonators independently of SiV color centers number, and via coated (bare) ellipsoidal nanoresonators seeded by four (six) SiV color centers. Indistinguishable superradiant state of four color centers and line-width narrowing is achieved via bare nanoresonators. Six color centers seeded bare spherical (ellipsoidal) nanoresonators result in larger fluorescence enhancement and more significantly overridden superradiance thresholds, while having slightly more (less) pronounced bad-cavity characteristics. Both phenomena are simultaneously optimized in ellipsoidal bare nanoresonators embedding six color centers with a slightly larger detuning.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.