Paper detail

Superconductivity in bilayer $t$-$t'$ Hubbard models

The relationship between crystal structures and superconducting critical temperatures has attracted considerable attention as a clue to designing higher-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductors. In particular, the relationship between the number $n$ of CuO$_2$ layers in a unit cell of cuprate superconductors and the optimum superconducting transition temperature $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$ is intriguing. As experimentally observed in layered cuprates, $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$ increases when $n$ is increased, up to $n=3$, and, then, decreases for larger $n$. However, the mechanism behind the $n$ dependence of $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$ remains elusive although there have been many studies on the $n$ dependence. In this paper, we studied a bilayer $t$-$t'$ Hubbard model to clarify the effects of the adjacent CuO$_2$ layers on the stability of the superconductivity by using a many-variable variational Monte Carlo method. We calculate the superconducting correlation at long distance and zero temperature, and the amplitude of the superconducting gap functions estimated from the momentum distribution as the observables correlated with $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$. It is found that the in-plane superconducting correlation is not enhanced in comparison with that in the single-layer $t$-$t'$ Hubbard model. The superconducting correlations of the bilayer Hamiltonian are significantly small in the overdoped region in comparison with those of single-layer Hamiltonian, which is attributed to the van Hove singularity. In addition, we found that the amplitude of the superconducting gap functions is also similar in both the single-layer and bilayer $t$-$t'$ Hubbard model at the optimal doping. Therefore, we conclude that the adjacent Hubbard layers are not relevant to the enhancement of $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$ in the bilayer cuprates. Possible origins of the enhanced $T_{\rm c}^{\rm opt}$ other than the adjacent layers are also discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.