Paper detail

Superconducting proximity effect on a two-dimensional Dirac electron system

The superconducting proximity effect on two-dimensional massless Dirac electrons is usually analyzed using a simple model consisting of the Dirac Hamiltonian and an energy-independent pair potential. Although this conventional model is plausible, it is questionable whether it can fully describe the proximity effect from a superconductor. Here, we derive a more general proximity model starting from an appropriate microscopic model for the Dirac electron system in planar contact with a superconductor. The resulting model describes the proximity effect in terms of the energy-dependent pair potential and renormalization term. Within this framework, we analyze the density of states, the quasiparticle wave function, and the charge conservation of Dirac electrons. The result reveals several characteristic features of the proximity effect, which cannot be captured within the conventional model.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.