Paper detail

Super-Solar Super Lyman Limit Systems

We present abundance measurements for two super Lyman Limit systems (SLLS; quasar absorption line systems with 10^19 cm^-2 < N_HI < 10^20.3 cm^-2) selected from a set of metal-strong absorbers in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar database. After applying estimate corrections for photoionization effects, we derive gas-phase metallicities of [M/H]=+0.7 +/- 0.2 dex for the SLLS at z=1.7749 toward SDSS0927+5621 and [M/H]=+0.05 +/- 0.1 dex for the SLLS at z=1.7678 toward SDSS0953+5230. The former exhibits among the highest gas metallicity of any astrophysical environment and its total metal surface density exceeds that of nearly every known damped Lya system. The properties of these absorbers -- high metallicity and large velocity width (> 300 km/s) -- resemble those of gas observed in absorption in the spectra of bright, star-forming galaxies at high redshift. We discuss the metal mass density of the SLLS based on these observations and our ongoing SLLS survey and argue that a conservative estimate to the total metal budget at z=2 is greater than 15% of the total, suggesting that the metal-rich LLS may represent the dominant metal reservoir in the young universe.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.