Paper detail

Super-resolution by means of Beurling minimal extrapolation

Let $M(\mathbb{T}^d)$ be the space of complex bounded Radon measures defined on the $d$-dimensional torus group $(\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})^d=\mathbb{T}^d$, equipped with the total variation norm $\|\cdot\|$; and let $\hatμ$ denote the Fourier transform of $μ\in M(\mathbb{T}^d)$. We address the super-resolution problem: For given spectral (Fourier transform) data defined on a finite set $Λ\subset\mathbb{Z}^d$, determine if there is a unique $μ\in M(\mathbb{T}^d)$ of minimal norm for which $\hatμ$ equals this data on $Λ$. Without additional assumptions on $μ$ and $Λ$, our main theorem shows that the solutions to the super-resolution problem, which we call minimal extrapolations, depend crucially on the set $Γ\subsetΛ$, defined in terms of $μ$ and $Λ$. For example, when $Γ=0$, the minimal extrapolations are singular measures supported in the zero set of an analytic function, and when $Γ\geq 2$, the minimal extrapolations are singular measures supported in the intersection of $Γ\choose 2$ hyperplanes. By theory and example, we show that the case $Γ=1$ is different from other cases and is deeply connected with the existence of positive minimal extrapolations. This theorem has implications to the possibility and impossibility of uniquely recovering $μ$ from $Λ$. We illustrate how to apply our theory to both directions, by computing pertinent analytical examples. These examples are of interest in both super-resolution and deterministic compressed sensing. Our concept of an admissibility range fundamentally connects Beurling's theory of minimal extrapolation with Candes and Fernandez-Granda's work on super-resolution. This connection is exploited to address situations where current algorithms fail to compute a numerical solution to the super-resolution problem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.