Paper detail

Summary of effect aliasing structure (SEAS): new descriptive statistics for factorial and supersaturated designs

In the assessment and selection of supersaturated designs, the aliasing structure of interaction effects is usually ignored by traditional criteria such as $E(s^2)$-optimality. We introduce the Summary of Effect Aliasing Structure (SEAS) for assessing the aliasing structure of supersaturated designs, and other non-regular fractional factorial designs, that takes account of interaction terms and provides more detail than usual summaries such as (generalized) resolution and wordlength patterns. The new summary consists of three criteria, abbreviated as MAP: (1) Maximum dependency aliasing pattern; (2) Average square aliasing pattern; and (3) Pairwise dependency ratio. These criteria provided insight when traditional criteria fail to differentiate between designs. We theoretically study the relationship between the MAP criteria and traditional quantities, and demonstrate the use of SEAS for comparing some example supersaturated designs, including designs suggested in the literature. We also propose a variant of SEAS to measure the aliasing structure for individual columns of a design, and use it to choose assignments of factors to columns for an $E(s^2)$-optimal design.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.