Paper detail

Sum rule violation in self-consistent hybridization expansions

We show that for multi-orbital quantum impurity models the non-crossing approximation and one-crossing approximation versions of the self-consistent hybridization expansions violate the sum rules relating the coefficients of the high-frequency expansion of the self energy and the product of the self energy and Green function to thermodynamic expectation values. Comparison of non-crossing/one-crossing results to numerically exact quantum Monte-Carlo calculations shows that the consistency with sum rules provides a useful estimate of the reliability of the approximations. The sum rule violations are more pronounced, and therefore the quality of the non-crossing/one-crossing approximation is poorer, in situations with multiple orbitals and away from particle-hole symmetry but becomes less severe as the correlation strength increases. The one crossing approximation is markedly superior to the non-crossing approximation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.