Paper detail

Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Sherrington-Kirkpatrick via Planted Affine Planes

The Sum-of-Squares (SoS) hierarchy is a semi-definite programming meta-algorithm that captures state-of-the-art polynomial time guarantees for many optimization problems such as Max-$k$-CSPs and Tensor PCA. On the flip side, a SoS lower bound provides evidence of hardness, which is particularly relevant to average-case problems for which NP-hardness may not be available. In this paper, we consider the following average case problem, which we call the \emph{Planted Affine Planes} (PAP) problem: Given $m$ random vectors $d_1,\ldots,d_m$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, can we prove that there is no vector $v \in \mathbb{R}^n$ such that for all $u \in [m]$, $\langle v, d_u\rangle^2 = 1$? In other words, can we prove that $m$ random vectors are not all contained in two parallel hyperplanes at equal distance from the origin? We prove that for $m \leq n^{3/2-ε}$, with high probability, degree-$n^{Ω(ε)}$ SoS fails to refute the existence of such a vector $v$. When the vectors $d_1,\ldots,d_m$ are chosen from the multivariate normal distribution, the PAP problem is equivalent to the problem of proving that a random $n$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^m$ does not contain a boolean vector. As shown by Mohanty--Raghavendra--Xu [STOC 2020], a lower bound for this problem implies a lower bound for the problem of certifying energy upper bounds on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian, and so our lower bound implies a degree-$n^{Ω(ε)}$ SoS lower bound for the certification version of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.