Paper detail

Subterranean production of neutrons, $^{39}$Ar and $^{21}$Ne: Rates and uncertainties

Accurate understanding of the subsurface production rate of the radionuclide $^{39}$Ar is necessary for argon dating techniques and noble gas geochemistry of the shallow and the deep Earth, and is also of interest to the WIMP dark matter experimental particle physics community. Our new calculations of subsurface production of neutrons, $^{21}$Ne, and $^{39}$Ar take advantage of the state-of-the-art reliable tools of nuclear physics to obtain reaction cross sections and spectra (TALYS) and to evaluate neutron propagation in rock (MCNP6). We discuss our method and results in relation to previous studies and show the relative importance of various neutron, $^{21}$Ne, and $^{39}$Ar nucleogenic production channels. Uncertainty in nuclear reaction cross sections, which is the major contributor to overall calculation uncertainty, is estimated from variability in existing experimental and library data. Depending on selected rock composition, on the order of $10^7$-$10^{10}$ α particles are produced in one kilogram of rock per year (order of 1-$10^3$ kg$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$); the number of produced neutrons is lower by $\sim6$ orders of magnitude, $^{21}$Ne production rate drops by an additional factor of 15-20, and another one order of magnitude or more is dropped in production of $^{39}$Ar. Our calculation yields a nucleogenic $^{21}$Ne/$^4$He production ratio of $(4.6\pm0.6) \times 10^{-8}$ in Continental Crust and $(4.2\pm0.5) \times 10^{-8}$ in Oceanic Crust and Depleted Mantle. Calculated $^{39}$Ar production rates span a great range from $29\pm9$ atoms kg-rock$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ in the K-Th-U-enriched Upper Continental Crust to $(2.6\pm0.8) \times 10^{-4}$ atoms kg-rock$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ in Depleted Upper Mantle. Nucleogenic $^{39}$Ar production exceeds the cosmogenic production below $\sim700$ meters depth and thus, affects radiometric ages of groundwater.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.