Paper detail

Subcritical percolation with a line of defects

We consider the Bernoulli bond percolation process $\mathbb{P}_{p,p&#39;}$ on the nearest-neighbor edges of $\mathbb{Z}^d$, which are open independently with probability $p<p_c$, except for those lying on the first coordinate axis, for which this probability is $p&#39;$. Define \[ξ_{p,p&#39;}:=-\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{-1}\log \mathbb{P}_{p,p&#39;}(0\leftrightarrow n\mathbf {e}_1)\] and $ξ_p:=ξ_{p,p}$. We show that there exists $p_c&#39;=p_c&#39;(p,d)$ such that $ξ_{p,p&#39;}=ξ_p$ if $p&#39;<p_c&#39;$ and $ξ_{p,p&#39;}<ξ_p$ if $p&#39;>p_c&#39;$. Moreover, $p_c&#39;(p,2)=p_c&#39;(p,3)=p$, and $p_c&#39;(p,d)>p$ for $d\geq 4$. We also analyze the behavior of $ξ_p-ξ_{p,p&#39;}$ as $p&#39;\downarrow p_c&#39;$ in dimensions $d=2,3$. Finally, we prove that when $p&#39;>p_c&#39;$, the following purely exponential asymptotics holds: \[\mathbb {P}_{p,p&#39;}(0\leftrightarrow n\mathbf {e}_1)=ψ_de^{-ξ_{p,p&#39;}n}\bigl(1+o(1)\bigr)\] for some constant $ψ_d=ψ_d(p,p&#39;)$, uniformly for large values of $n$. This work gives the first results on the rigorous analysis of pinning-type problems, that go beyond the effective models and don&#39;t rely on exact computations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.