Paper detail

Sub-barrier fusion enhancement due to positive Q-value four-neutron transfer

The influence of positive $Q$-value four-neutron transfer (PQ4NT) effects on the sub-barrier capture cross sections is systematically investigated using the empirical barrier distribution (EBD2) method. For 13 fusion reactions with $Q_{4n}>0$, sustained neutron-pair transfer is found to reduce barrier heights and enhance capture cross sections at sub-barrier energies. In contrast, reactions such as $^{18}$O+$^{58}$Ni, which have $Q_{2n}>0$ but $Q_{4n}<0$, exhibit no enhancement due to the stalling of subsequent neutron-pair transfer after the initial 2n transfer. By incorporating PQ4NT effects into EBD2 for systems with $Q_{4n}>0$, the average deviation between predicted and experimental capture cross sections (113 datasets) is significantly reduced by $20\%$. Additionally, comparing with the systems induced by $^{48}$Ca ($Q_{4n}<0$), much larger neutron pickup probabilities are observed in the quasi-elastic scattering of $^{40}$Ca-induced reactions ($Q_{4n}>0$) from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) calculations.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.