Paper detail

Sub-1.5 Time-Optimal Multi-Robot Path Planning on Grids in Polynomial Time

Graph-based multi-robot path planning (MRPP) is NP-hard to optimally solve. In this work, we propose the first low polynomial-time algorithm for MRPP achieving 1--1.5 asymptotic optimality guarantees on makespan for random instances under very high robot density, with high probability. The dual guarantee on computational efficiency and solution optimality suggests our proposed general method is promising in significantly scaling up multi-robot applications for logistics, e.g., at large robotic warehouses. Specifically, on an $m_1\times m_2$ gird, $m_1 \ge m_2$, our RTH (Rubik Table with Highways) algorithm computes solutions for routing up to $\frac{m_1m_2}{3}$ robots with uniformly randomly distributed start and goal configurations with a makespan of $m_1 + 2m_2 + o(m_1)$, with high probability. Because the minimum makespan for such instances is $m_1 + m_2 - o(m_1)$, also with high probability, RTH guarantees $\frac{m_1+2m_2}{m_1+m_2}$ optimality as $m_1 \to \infty$ for random instances with up to $\frac{1}{3}$ robot density, with high probability. $\frac{m_1+2m_2}{m_1+m_2} \in (1, 1.5]$. Alongside this key result, we also establish a series of related results supporting even higher robot densities and environments with regularly distributed obstacles, which directly map to real-world parcel sorting scenarios. Building on the baseline methods with provable guarantees, we have developed effective, principled heuristics that further improve the computed optimality of the RTH algorithms. In extensive numerical evaluations, RTH and its variants demonstrate exceptional scalability as compared with methods including ECBS and DDM, scaling to over $450 \times 300$ grids with $45,000$ robots, and consistently achieves makespan around $1.5$ optimal or better, as predicted by our theoretical analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.