Paper detail

Study on Scheduling Techniques for Ultra Dense Small Cell Networks

The most promising approach to enhance network capacity for the next generation of wireless cellular networks (5G) is densification, which benefits from the extensive spatial reuse of the spectrum and the reduced distance between transmitters and receivers. In this paper, we examine the performance of different schedulers in ultra dense small cell deployments. Due to the stronger line of sight (LOS) at low inter-site distances (ISDs), we discuss that the Rician fading channel model is more suitable to study network performance than the Rayleigh one, and model the Rician K factor as a function of distance between the user equipment (UE) and its serving base station (BS). We also construct a cross-correlation shadowing model that takes into account the ISD, and finally investigate potential multi-user diversity gains in ultra dense small cell deployments by comparing the performances of proportional fair (PF) and round robin (RR) schedulers. Our study shows that as network becomes denser, the LOS component starts to dominate the path loss model which significantly increases the interference. Simulation results also show that multi-user diversity is considerably reduced at low ISDs, and thus the PF scheduling gain over the RR one is small, around 10% in terms of cell throughput. As a result, the RR scheduling may be preferred for dense small cell deployments due to its simplicity. Despite both the interference aggravation as well as the multi-user diversity loss, network densification is still worth it from a capacity view point.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.