Paper detail

Study of vacuum behavior for inert models with discrete $Z_{2}$-like and abelian $U(1)$ symmetries

We study the vacuum behavior at one loop level in extended Higgs sectors with two doublets (2HDM), where $U(1)$ and $Z_{2}$ symmetries are considered to protect the $CP$ symmetry in the Higgs potential and to avoid Flavor Changing Neutral Currents at tree level in the Yukawa sector. In the Inert Higgs Model case, a detailed comparison is made between both models by using the energy evolution of couplings, which should satisfy energy scale dependent relations deduced for minima and stationary points of the Higgs potential at tree level. Besides, perturbative unitarity constraints at tree level are considered to generate the allowed parameter space compatible with perturbativity (absence of Landau poles). Our studies illustrate exclusion regions for Higgs masses and other combinations of couplings in the scalar sector, in particular for splittings of mass square for neutral scalars $A^{0}$ and $H^{0}$, as well as the difference between the sum of these and the charged Higgs mass square. From the vacuum stability for inert-2HDM at the tree and one loop levels, analyses lead us to find out new hierarchical structures for scalar masses. To complete vacuum studies on the Inert model, and based on reparameterization invariance of the Higgs potential, we compute original discriminants that allow ensuring the presence of a global electroweak minimum at tree level. Moreover, the behavior in high energy scales drives out analyzing criticality phenomena for the additional parameters of extended Higgs sectors. Finally, and using the consistency with the electroweak precision analyses of oblique parameters, we describe several implications from different regimes of the inert model on charged and pseudoscalar Higgs searches.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.