Paper detail

Study of Temporal Evolution of Emission Spectrum in a Steeply Rising Submillimeter Burst

In the paper the spectral temporal evolution of a steeply rising submillimeter (THz) burst occurred on 2003 November 2 was investigated in detail for the first time. Observations show that the flux density of the THz spectrum increased steeply with frequency above 200 GHz. Their average rising rates reached a value of 235 sfu/GHz (corresponding spectral index $α$ of 4.8) during the burst. The flux densities reached about 4,000 and 70,000 sfu at 212 and 405 GHz at maximum phase, respectively. The emissions at 405 GHz maintained continuous high level that they exceed largely the peak values of the microwave (MW) spectra during the main phase. Our studies suggest that only energetic electrons with a low-energy cutoff of $\sim$1 MeV and number density of $\sim$$10^{6}$--$10^{8}$ cm$^{-3}$ can produce such strong and steeply rising THz component via gyrosynchrotron (GS) radiation based on numerical simulations of burst spectra in the nonuniform magnetic field case. The electron number density $N$, derived from our numerical fits to the THz temporal evolution spectra, increased substantially from $8\times10^{6}$ to $4\times10^{8}$ cm$^{-3}$, i.e., $N$ value increased 50 times during the rise phase. During the decay phase it decreased to $7\times10^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$, i.e., decreased about five times from the maximum phase. The total electron number decreased an order of magnitude from the maximum phase to the decay phase. Nevertheless the variation amplitude of $N$ is only about one time in the MW emission source during this burst, and the total electron number did not decrease but increased by about 20$\%$ during the decay phase. Interestingly, we find that the THz source radius decreased by about 24$\%$ while the MW source one, on the contrary, increased by 28$\%$ during the decay phase.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.