Paper detail

Study of Some Parameters of Modified Chaplygin Gas in Galileon Gravity Theory from Observational Perspective

We have assumed the FRW model of the universe in Galileon gravity, which is filled with dark matter and Modified Chaplygin gas (MCG) type dark energy. We present the Hubble parameter in terms of some unknown parameters and observational parameters with the redshift $z$. Some cosmological parameters are reconstructed and plots are generated to study the nature of the model and its viability. It is seen that the model is perfectly consistent with the present cosmic acceleration. From \textit{observed Hubble data (OHD) set or Stern data set} of 12 points, we have obtained the bounds of the arbitrary parameters ($A,B$) & ($A,C$) by minimizing the $χ^{2}$ test. Next due to joint analysis of \textit{Stern+BAO} and \textit{Stern+BAO+CMB} observations, we have also obtained the best fit values and the bounds of the parameters ($A,B$) & ($A,C$) by fixing some other parameters. The best-fit values and bounds of the parameters are obtained with 66%, 90% and 99% confidence levels for \textit{Stern, Stern+BAO and Stern+BAO+CMB} joint analysis. Next we have also taken type Ia supernovae data set (union 2 data set with 557 data points). The distance modulus $μ(z)$ against redshift $z$ for our theoretical MCG model in Galileon gravity have been tested for the best fit values of the parameters and the observed \textit{SNe Ia union 2 data} sample and from this, we have concluded that our model is in agreement with the union 2 sample data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.