Paper detail

Study of scalar meson $a_0(980)$ from $B \to a_0(980)π$ Decays

In this paper, we calculate the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays $\bar{B}^0\to a^0_0(980)π^0, a^+_0(980)π^-, a^-_0(980)π^+$ and $B^-\to a^0_0(980)π^-, a^-_0(980)π^0$ by employing the perturbative QCD factorization approach. Although the light scalar meson $a_0(980)$ is widely perceived as primarily the four-quark bound states, the calculation shows that the 2-quark model supposition for $a_0(980)$ can not be ruled out by the currently available experiment upper limits. In these considered decays, the branching ratio for the $B^-\to a^0_0(980)π^-$ is the largest, $2.8\times 10^{-6}$, while its direct CP asymmetry is the smallest, $\sim 14%$. Although the direct CP asymmetries for the decays $\bar{B}^0\to a^0_0(980)π^0, B^-\to a^-_0(980)π^0$ are large, about $(70\thicksim80)%$, it is still difficult to measure them, since their branching ratios are small, around $(4\thicksim5)\times 10^{-7}$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.