Paper detail

Study of relativistic charged particles production in ^{84}Kr$_{36}+Em interaction at around 1 A GeV with wounded nucleon model

This article is focused on the multiplicity and probability distribution of the emitted charged pions <N_π> for interaction of ^{84}Kr_{36} projectile with nuclear emulsion targets at kinetic energy 1 GeV per nucleon. In the wounded nucleon model frame work, we have calculated the total number of wounded nucleons (W) and total number of interactions (ν). The obtained results revealed that the average multiplicity of the charged pions <N_π> is dependent on the projectile and target mass. The calculated values of the wounded nucleons (W) and total number of interactions (ν) shows strong dependence on the mass of the colliding nuclei. The emission rate of mean multiplicity of the <N_{s}> and <N_π> increases with increasing the total number of wounded nucleons (W) and total number of interactions (ν). The mean multiplicity value of <N_{s}> and <N_π> linearly increases with increasing the projectile mass number (A_{P}) and independent of the incident energy.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.